Сравнение на методи

	Причинно-следствена идентификация с насочени ациклични графи (do-calculus)	Метод на инструменталните променливи (IV) за причинно-следствен анализ
Област	Причинно-следствено заключение	Икономика на здравеопазването
Семейство	Regression model	Process / pipeline
Година на възникване	2009	1990s (modern applications)
Създател	Judea Pearl	Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
Тип	Causal identification framework	Method
Основополагащ източник	Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606	Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Други названия	do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus)	IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
Свързани	5	3
Резюме	DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths.	Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.