Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Критична Страусова обоснована теория× | Критична конструктивистка обоснована теория× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1990s (Straussian GT); critical synthesis from 2000s onward | 2000s–2010s (post-Charmaz 2006) |
| Създател≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian base); critical integration draws on critical theory traditions (e.g., Kincheloe, Denzin) | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist GT base); synthesis with critical theory by various scholars (e.g., Belfrage, Hauf; Street; Wuest) |
| Тип | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803932500 | Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029164 |
| Други названия≠ | critical GT (Straussian), critical Strauss-Corbin grounded theory, critical systematic grounded theory | Critical CGT, Critical constructivist GT, Emancipatory constructivist grounded theory, Critical Charmaz grounded theory |
| Свързани≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Резюме≠ | Critical Straussian Grounded Theory combines the systematic coding procedures of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory — open, axial, and selective coding leading to a paradigm model — with a critical theoretical stance that foregrounds power, inequality, and social structure. The researcher does not merely describe a social process but interrogates the conditions that produce and sustain it, connecting emergent theory to broader structures of domination or marginalization. | Critical constructivist grounded theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with an explicit critical theoretical lens — typically feminist, critical race, or Freireian frameworks — to generate theory that not only explains a social process but also interrogates power relations, structural inequalities, and ideological forces that shape participants' experiences. The result is grounded theory with an emancipatory intent. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|