Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Критична конструктивистка обоснована теория× | Обусловена теория× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област≠ | Качествени методи | Качествени изследвания |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2000s–2010s (post-Charmaz 2006) | 1967 |
| Създател≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist GT base); synthesis with critical theory by various scholars (e.g., Belfrage, Hauf; Street; Wuest) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029164 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Други названия≠ | Critical CGT, Critical constructivist GT, Emancipatory constructivist grounded theory, Critical Charmaz grounded theory | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Свързани≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Резюме≠ | Critical constructivist grounded theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with an explicit critical theoretical lens — typically feminist, critical race, or Freireian frameworks — to generate theory that not only explains a social process but also interrogates power relations, structural inequalities, and ideological forces that shape participants' experiences. The result is grounded theory with an emancipatory intent. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|