ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Комплексна пропорционална оценка×CILOS×
ОбластВземане на решенияВземане на решения
СемействоMCDMMCDM
Година на възникване19962016
СъздателZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
ТипProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Основополагащ източникZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Други названия
Свързани88
РезюмеCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: COPRAS · CILOS. Извлечено на 2026-06-17 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare