ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Съдържателна валидност×Дискриминантна валидност×
ОбластПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Година на възникване19751959
СъздателC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
ТипValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Основополагащ източникLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Други названияcontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Свързани65
РезюмеContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Content Validity · Discriminant Validity. Извлечено на 2026-06-17 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare