ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Конструктна валидност×Дискриминантна валидност×
ОбластПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Година на възникване19551959
СъздателLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
ТипValidity evaluation frameworkValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
Основополагащ източникCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Други названияconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
Свързани65
РезюмеConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Construct Validity · Discriminant Validity. Извлечено на 2026-06-15 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare