ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Тест на Conover-Iman (post-hoc)×Тест на Фридман×
ОбластСтатистикаСтатистика
СемействоRegression modelHypothesis test
Година на възникване19791937
СъздателConover & ImanMilton Friedman
ТипNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric repeated-measures comparison (by ranks)
Основополагащ източникConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675–701. DOI ↗
Други названияConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiFriedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks, Friedman rank test, Friedman Testi
Свързани32
РезюмеThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.The Friedman test is a nonparametric hypothesis test that compares three or more related conditions measured on the same blocks or subjects, serving as the rank-based alternative to repeated-measures ANOVA. It was introduced by Milton Friedman in 1937 and works on ordinal or continuous data without assuming normality.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Conover-Iman Test · Friedman test. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare