Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Конфирматорният факторен анализ (CFA)× | Анализ на главните компоненти× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област≠ | Психометрия | Машинно обучение |
| Семейство≠ | Latent structure | Machine learning |
| Година на възникване≠ | 1969 | 2002 |
| Създател≠ | Karl Gustav Jöreskog | Jolliffe, I.T. (textbook); Pearson & Hotelling (origins) |
| Тип≠ | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model | Unsupervised dimensionality reduction |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ | Jolliffe, I.T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. DOI ↗ |
| Други названия | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis | Temel Bileşenler Analizi (PCA), PCA, principal components analysis, Karhunen-Loève transform |
| Свързани≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Резюме≠ | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. | Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is an unsupervised dimensionality-reduction method — given its modern textbook treatment by Ian Jolliffe (2002) — that compresses high-dimensional data into fewer dimensions while preserving the maximum possible variance. It re-expresses correlated variables as a small set of uncorrelated principal components ordered by how much of the data's variation each one captures. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|