Сравнение на методи
Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.
| Сравнителна конструктивистка обоснована теория× | Интерпретативна конструктивистка обоснована теория× | |
|---|---|---|
| Област | Качествени методи | Качествени методи |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Година на възникване≠ | 2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014) | 2000–2006 |
| Създател≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature | Kathy Charmaz |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research design and analytic approach |
| Основополагащ източник≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133 | Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029140 |
| Други названия | Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory | constructivist GT, interpretive CGT, Charmaz grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory |
| Свързани | 6 | 6 |
| Резюме≠ | Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data. | Interpretive constructivist grounded theory is a qualitative research design in which the researcher and participants are understood as jointly constructing meaning, and theory is built inductively from data through systematic comparative analysis. Developed by Kathy Charmaz as a departure from the positivist assumptions of classic grounded theory, this approach situates both the researcher and participants as active interpreters whose social positions, values, and interactions shape the categories and theory that emerge from the study. |
| ScholarGateНабор от данни ↗ |
|
|