ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Преглед с картиране, подпомогнато от библиометрикс×Преглед на обхвата×
ОбластНаукометрияНаукометрия
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване2017 (bibliometrix tool); mapping review approach formalised c. 2010s2005
СъздателAria & Cuccurullo (bibliometrix, 2017); mapping review methodology developed in evidence synthesis community (~2000s)Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
ТипTool-assisted evidence mapping reviewEvidence synthesis review design
Основополагащ източникAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. DOI ↗Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗
Други названияbibliometrix mapping review, R-bibliometrix evidence map, bibliometric-assisted systematic map, bibliometrix evidence synthesis mapscoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Свързани56
РезюмеA bibliometrix-assisted mapping review combines the structured scope-and-search logic of an evidence mapping review with the analytical power of the bibliometrix R package. Instead of manually categorising studies, the researcher leverages bibliometrix functions — keyword co-occurrence networks, thematic clustering, and yearly trend analysis — to chart the landscape of a research field systematically and at scale, producing an interactive, reproducible evidence map.A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: bibliometrix-assisted mapping review · Scoping Review. Извлечено на 2026-06-19 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare