ScholarGate
Асистент

Сравнение на методи

Прегледайте избраните методи един до друг; редовете с разлики са откроени.

Откриване на архитектурни миризми×Модел за прогнозиране на дефекти×
ОбластСофтуерно инженерствоСофтуерно инженерство
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Година на възникване20092005
СъздателMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Типpattern-based analysismachine learning model
Основополагащ източникFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Други названияdesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Свързани44
РезюмеArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateНабор от данни
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Източници
  3. PUBLISHED

Към търсенето Изтегляне на слайдове

ScholarGateСравнение на методи: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Извлечено на 2026-06-18 от https://scholargate.app/bg/compare