Board Interlock Network Analysis
Board interlock network analysis treats the corporate economy as a network in which two firms are tied whenever they share a director, and studies how these interlocking directorates channel information, influence, and the diffusion of practices among companies. Mizruchi's 1996 Annual Review of Sociology synthesis crystallized the field, distinguishing the determinants of interlocks from their consequences and cataloguing the mechanisms — collusion, cooptation and monitoring, legitimacy, career advancement, and social cohesion — that interlocks have been argued to serve. Davis's 1991 study of how the poison-pill takeover defense spread through the board network gave the perspective its canonical demonstration that corporate practices diffuse along director ties. The method combines two-mode-to-one-mode network construction with positional metrics and diffusion modeling.
اقرأ الطريقة كاملة
سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.
خريطة المناهج
محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.
المصادر
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271-298. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271 ↗
- Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613. DOI: 10.2307/2393275 ↗
كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Board Interlock Network Analysis (Interlocking Directorates as Inter-Firm Networks). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/strategic-management/board-interlock-network-analysis
أيُّ منهج؟
ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.
- Diversification-Performance Analysis (Rumelt Categories)الإدارة الاستراتيجية↔ قارن
- Merger and Acquisition Performance Event Studyالإدارة الاستراتيجية↔ قارن
- Upper Echelons (TMT) Analysisالإدارة الاستراتيجية↔ قارن