ScholarGate
المساعد
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / tradition history

Form Criticism

Form criticism (Formgeschichte) studies the small, originally oral units that make up the biblical text, asking what genre each unit belongs to, what social setting gave rise to it, and how it developed before reaching written form. Hermann Gunkel pioneered the approach for the Hebrew Bible, treating the narratives of Genesis and the Psalms as folk forms shaped by communal use, while Rudolf Bultmann and Martin Dibelius applied it to the Gospels, analyzing the sayings and stories about Jesus as units that circulated and were shaped by the early church before the evangelists wrote. Bultmann's 1921 History of the Synoptic Tradition is the method's most systematic statement. The core conviction is that form and function are linked: a unit's genre points to the recurring life-setting, the Sitz im Leben, in which the community used it.

افتح في MethodMindقريبًاطبّق، قارن، واحصل على إرشادات
الأدوات والموارد
تنزيل الشرائح
التعلّم والاستكشاف
فيديوقريبًا

اقرأ الطريقة كاملة

للأعضاء فقط

سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.

تسجيل الدخول

خريطة المناهج

محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.

المصادر

  1. Bultmann, R. (1963). The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. J. Marsh). New York: Harper & Row. [German original 1921]. ISBN: 9780060611729
  2. Gunkel, H. (1987). The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga and History (trans. W. H. Carruth). New York: Schocken Books. [German original 1901]. ISBN: 9780805200867

كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Form Criticism (Formgeschichte: Genre Classification and Tradition History). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/religious-studies/form-criticism

أيُّ منهج؟

ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.

قارن جنباً إلى جنب

يُستشهد بها في

ScholarGateForm Criticism (Form Criticism (Formgeschichte: Genre Classification and Tradition History)). استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-24 من https://scholargate.app/ar/religious-studies/form-criticism · مجموعة البيانات: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026