Query Expansion Evaluation
Query expansion evaluation measures whether adding terms to a user's query — drawn from a thesaurus, from corpus co-occurrence statistics, or from relevance or pseudo-relevance feedback — actually improves retrieval. Expansion attacks the vocabulary-mismatch problem, where relevant documents use words the searcher did not, and it tends to raise recall by bringing in synonymous and related terms. But it can also lower precision by introducing ambiguity, and it can help some queries while badly hurting others. Sound evaluation therefore reports not just the average effectiveness change but the recall-precision trade-off and a robustness analysis of how many individual queries were helped versus harmed.
اقرأ الطريقة كاملة
سجّل الدخول بحساب مجاني لقراءة هذا القسم.
خريطة المناهج
محيط المناهج ذات الصلة — اختر عقدةً للاستكشاف.
المصادر
- Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521865715
- Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1990). Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 288-297. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199006)41:4<288::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
- Voorhees, E. M., & Harman, D. K. (Eds.). (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262220736
كيف تستشهد بهذه الصفحة
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Query Expansion Evaluation (Measuring the Effect of Term Addition on Retrieval). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ar/library-information-science/query-expansion-evaluation
أيُّ منهج؟
ضع هذا المنهج إلى جانب أقرب نظائره واقرأهما جنباً إلى جنب — المكتبة تضع الكتب على الطاولة، والاختيار لك.
- Cranfield Evaluation ParadigmLibrary Information Science↔ قارن
- Relevance Feedback EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ قارن
- TREC Pooling and Relevance JudgmentsLibrary Information Science↔ قارن