ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

Wordfish Scaling×Ideal Point Estimation×
المجالPolitical SciencePolitical Science
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة20082004
صاحب الطريقةJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver ProkschClinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
النوعUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count dataLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
المصدر التأسيسيSlapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimationIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
ذات صلة44
الملخصWordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Wordfish Scaling · Ideal Point Estimation. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-25 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare