قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| Valuation Studies Method× | Actor-Network Theory Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2013 | 1984 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Fabian Muniesa, Michèle Lamont | Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law |
| النوع≠ | Practice-oriented method for studying valuation | Material-semiotic theory and analytic method |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Helgesson, C.-F., & Muniesa, F. (2013). For what it's worth: an introduction to valuation studies. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 1-10. DOI ↗ | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051 |
| الأسماء البديلة | Sociology of valuation, Valography, Study of evaluation practices | ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping |
| ذات صلة | 4 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | The valuation studies method treats valuation—the production, measurement, ordering, and contestation of worth—as a social practice to be studied empirically rather than a hidden mental act or a settled economic fact. Consolidated by Claes-Fredrik Helgesson and Fabian Muniesa and complemented by Michèle Lamont's comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation, it follows how rankings, metrics, prices, and evaluation procedures actually do their work, and asks how worth comes to be, by whom, with which devices, and to what effect. | Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|