قارن الطرق

	مراجعة منهجية مقطعية زمنية للأدبيات	تحليل ببليومتري
المجال	القياسات العلمية	القياسات العلمية
العائلة	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
سنة النشأة	2010s	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
صاحب الطريقة	Adapted from systematic review methodology; temporal segmentation formalized in bibliometric practice (Zupic & Cater, 2015; Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017)	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
النوع	Systematic review variant with temporal segmentation	Quantitative literature analysis
المصدر التأسيسي	Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
الأسماء البديلة	temporal systematic review, period-based systematic review, chronological systematic review, time-segmented literature review	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
ذات صلة	5	6
الملخص	A time-sliced systematic literature review applies the rigorous search, screening, and synthesis protocol of a standard systematic review while dividing the retrieved corpus into discrete temporal periods — time slices — and analyzing each period separately. This design reveals how a research field has developed across time: which topics emerged, grew, or declined; how key authors and journals shifted; and how intellectual structures evolved from one era to the next.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.