ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

التجربة الميدانية أحادية التعمية×التجربة الميدانية العشوائية العنقودية×
المجالالتصميم التجريبيالتصميم التجريبي
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأةMid-20th century (blinding conventions formalised 1940s–1960s)1980s–1990s (formalized methodology)
صاحب الطريقةEstablished practice in experimental social science and clinical research; codified by Campbell & Stanley (1963) and Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)David M. Murray (group-randomized trials framework); applied broadly in public health and education research
النوعControlled field experiment with partial blindingRandomized experimental design
المصدر التأسيسيShadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120424
الأسماء البديلةsingle-masked field experiment, field experiment with single blinding, single-blind natural-setting trialCRFE, cluster-randomized trial in the field, group-randomized field experiment, community-randomized field experiment
ذات صلة64
الملخصA single-blind field experiment combines real-world experimental conditions with partial blinding: either participants or outcome assessors — but not both — are kept unaware of treatment assignment. This design reduces demand characteristics or observer bias while preserving ecological validity, making it a practical middle ground when full double-blinding is logistically infeasible in naturalistic settings.A cluster randomized field experiment (CRFE) assigns intact groups — schools, villages, clinics, workplaces — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions, and the experiment is conducted in real-world settings rather than a laboratory. Randomization at the group level controls for contamination between conditions while preserving the ecological validity of the natural environment. It is the dominant design for evaluating community-level, school-based, or workplace interventions in public health, education policy, and development economics.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Single-blind field experiment · Cluster Randomized Field Experiment. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare