ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية المحتوى للشكل المختصر×صلاحية البناء×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة1995–20001955
صاحب الطريقةMessick (validity framework); Smith et al. (short-form standards)Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
النوعValidity evaluationValidity evaluation framework
المصدر التأسيسيSmith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةabbreviated scale content validity, short-scale content coverage, brief form content validity, content validity for short formsconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
ذات صلة66
الملخصShort-form content validity evaluates whether items retained in an abbreviated scale still adequately represent every substantive facet of the construct measured by the original full-length instrument. It ensures that shortening a scale does not hollow out the conceptual domain it was designed to cover.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Short form content validity · Construct Validity. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare