ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تقييم الاختبارات والبرامج الفاحصة×تحليل العلاقة بين الجرعة والاستجابة×
المجالعلم الأوبئةعلم الأوبئة
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000sConceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th century
صاحب الطريقةWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluationParacelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford Hill
النوعObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation designQuantitative analytical method
المصدر التأسيسيWilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
الأسماء البديلةscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STEexposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRA
ذات صلة64
الملخصScreening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Screening Test Evaluation · Dose-Response Analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare