ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تحليل علم القياس - دراسة كمية للعلم×تحليل الاقتباس المشترك (Co-Citation Analysis)×
المجالالقياسات العلميةالقياسات الببليومترية
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)1973
صاحب الطريقةV. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)Henry Small
النوعQuantitative literature analysisMethod
المصدر التأسيسيNalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةscientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysisco-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis
ذات صلة65
الملخصScientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Scientometric Analysis · Co-Citation Analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare