قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| روش Rough-TOPSIS× | أهمية المعايير من خلال الارتباط البيني للمعايير× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | اتخاذ القرار | اتخاذ القرار |
| العائلة | MCDM | MCDM |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2013 | 1995 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| النوع≠ | Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة | — | — |
| ذات صلة | 8 | 8 |
| الملخص≠ | ROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|