ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تقييم اختبار الفحص المعدل حسب المخاطر×تقييم الاختبارات والبرامج الفاحصة×
المجالعلم الأوبئةعلم الأوبئة
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأةLate 1990s–2000s (formal statistical framework ~1997–2009)1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
صاحب الطريقةMargaret Sullivan Pepe and colleagues (covariate-adjusted ROC methodology)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
النوعAnalytical study designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
المصدر التأسيسيPepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198565826Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
الأسماء البديلةrisk-stratified screening accuracy study, covariate-adjusted diagnostic accuracy evaluation, risk-adjusted screening performance assessment, RASTEscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
ذات صلة66
الملخصRisk-adjusted screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and overall discriminatory accuracy of a screening test after accounting for patient-level risk factors (covariates) that independently influence test results or disease prevalence. By conditioning performance metrics on observed covariates — age, sex, comorbidities, or prior screening history — this approach yields accuracy estimates that are not confounded by differences in population risk profiles, enabling fair comparisons across subgroups or study settings.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Risk-adjusted screening test evaluation · Screening Test Evaluation. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare