قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| العينة القصدية× | أخذ العينات ذو التباين الأقصى× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | منهجية المسح | منهجية المسح |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | Formalized ~1980–1990 | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton |
| النوع≠ | Non-probability sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| الأسماء البديلة | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling |
| ذات صلة≠ | 4 | 5 |
| الملخص≠ | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|