ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تحليل تلوي قائم على بروتوكول×مراجعة الأدبيات المنهجية×
المجالالقياسات العلميةالقياسات العلمية
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة1990s–2015 (Cochrane established 1993; PROSPERO launched 2011; PRISMA-P 2015)1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)
صاحب الطريقةCochrane Collaboration; formalized through PROSPERO and PRISMA-P initiativesArchie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)
النوعEvidence synthesis with pre-registered protocolEvidence synthesis methodology
المصدر التأسيسيHiggins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4). Cochrane. link ↗Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗
الأسماء البديلةpre-registered meta-analysis, prospective meta-analysis, registered meta-analysis, protocol-driven meta-analysisSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature review
ذات صلة45
الملخصA protocol-based meta-analysis is a meta-analysis conducted according to a detailed, pre-registered protocol that specifies all key methodological decisions — research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, outcome measures, and statistical methods — before data collection begins. Pre-registration, typically through PROSPERO or a comparable registry, distinguishes this approach from post-hoc or exploratory meta-analyses and substantially reduces the risk of selective reporting and outcome switching.A systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Protocol-based Meta-analysis · Systematic Literature Review. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare