قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| تحليل السيناريوهات السياساتية× | تحليل الحساسية× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال≠ | المحاكاة | اتخاذ القرار |
| العائلة≠ | Process / pipeline | MCDM |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1967–1990s | 2004 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Kahn, H. & Wiener, A. J. (seminal); adapted for policy by RAND Corporation and OECD | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. |
| النوع≠ | Qualitative-quantitative hybrid scenario method | Robustness wrapper — parameter / weight perturbation sensitivity indices |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Swart, R., Raskin, P., Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 137–146. DOI ↗ | Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. Wiley, Chichester DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | PSA, Policy Scenarios, Policy Impact Scenario Analysis, Counterfactual Policy Analysis | — |
| ذات صلة≠ | 5 | 0 |
| الملخص≠ | Policy Scenario Analysis is a structured method for evaluating how different policy interventions perform across a range of plausible future states. By pairing specific policy levers with alternative scenarios, analysts can assess robustness, trade-offs, and unintended consequences of policy choices before implementation — making it a cornerstone of evidence-based policy design in fields from climate to public health. | SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS (Sensitivity Analysis — Systematic assessment of output variation w.r.t. input perturbations) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M. in 2004. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|