ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

Participatory Technology Assessment×Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment×
المجالScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19952013
صاحب الطريقةDanish Board of Technology tradition; Simon Joss, John Durant, Leonhard HennenJack Stilgoe, Richard Owen, Phil Macnaghten
النوعDeliberative public-participation processNormative governance and reflexive-assessment process
المصدر التأسيسيJoss, S., & Durant, J. (Eds.). (1995). Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. Science Museum. ISBN: 9780901805874Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةpTA, Public technology assessment, Citizen technology assessmentRRI assessment, Responsible innovation framework, AIRR assessment
ذات صلة44
الملخصParticipatory technology assessment (pTA) involves lay citizens and stakeholders—not only experts—in assessing the social, ethical, and political dimensions of technologies. Through structured deliberative formats such as consensus conferences, citizens' juries, and scenario workshops, ordinary people are informed, allowed to question experts, and helped to form and articulate a considered collective view, which is then fed into public and policy debate. pTA democratises technology assessment, treating the public not as a problem to be managed but as a legitimate voice in technological choices.Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) assessment is an approach to governing science and innovation that asks not only whether a technology works but whether it is desirable, and seeks to align research and innovation with the values, needs, and expectations of society. The influential Stilgoe-Owen-Macnaghten framework operationalises this through four dimensions—anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness (AIRR)—that are built into the innovation process so that direction and purpose, not just risk and product, become objects of deliberate care.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Participatory Technology Assessment · Responsible Research and Innovation Assessment. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-25 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare