ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تقنية المجموعة الاسمية×بحث الفعل×تحليل المحتوى×
المجالنوعيالبحث النوعينوعي
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19711946Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
صاحب الطريقةAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
النوعQualitative research methodMethodQualitative / mixed-method research technique
المصدر التأسيسيDelbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
الأسماء البديلةNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiryİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
ذات صلة615
الملخصThe Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Nominal Group Technique · Action Research · Content Analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare