ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

التحليل التلوي الشبكي×تحليل تحيز النشر×
المجالتجميع الأدلةالتحليل البعدي
العائلةProcess / pipelineHypothesis test
سنة النشأة20021997
صاحب الطريقةLumley (2002)Matthias Egger et al.
النوعMethodDiagnostic bias test for meta-analysis
المصدر التأسيسيLumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةMixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-AnalysisSmall-Study Effects Test, Funnel Plot Asymmetry Test, Egger Regression Test, Yayın Yanlılığı Analizi
ذات صلة11
الملخصNetwork meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.Publication bias analysis examines whether the set of studies included in a meta-analysis is a representative sample of all conducted research, or whether studies with non-significant or unfavorable results have been systematically suppressed. Matthias Egger and colleagues introduced the regression-based funnel plot asymmetry test in 1997, providing a formal statistical complement to the graphical funnel plot inspection long used in evidence synthesis.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Network Meta-Analysis · Publication Bias Analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare