قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| تحليل علمي معياري قائم على الشبكات× | رسم الخرائط العلمية× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال≠ | القياسات العلمية | القياسات الببليومترية |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s | 2000s |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Derek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping) | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| النوع≠ | Quantitative bibliometric method | Method |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | scientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mapping | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| ذات صلة≠ | 6 | 5 |
| الملخص≠ | Network-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|