قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| Need for Closure Scale× | مقياس السلطوية اليمينية المتطرفة× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال≠ | علم النفس السياسي | علم النفس الاجتماعي |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1994 | 1981 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Donna M. Webster & Arie W. Kruglanski | Bob Altemeyer |
| النوع≠ | Self-report individual-difference scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | NFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski Scale | RWA |
| ذات صلة | 4 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|