ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

الصلاحية القانونية متعددة المستويات×الصلاحية التمييزية×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة20051959
صاحب الطريقةChen, Bliese & Mathieu (building on Cronbach & Meehl)Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
النوعValidity assessment / construct validationValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
المصدر التأسيسيChen, G., Bliese, P. D. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8(4), 375–409. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةcross-level construct validity, multilevel construct validation, MNV, nomological validity across levelsdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
ذات صلة45
الملخصMultilevel nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct and its network of theoretical relationships hold consistently across multiple levels of analysis — such as individual, team, and organization. It extends classical construct validation to nested data structures, ensuring that a measure means the same thing and behaves as theory predicts at each level.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Multilevel nomological validity · Discriminant Validity. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare