ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية المحتوى متعدد المستويات×صلاحية البناء×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة1975–2000s1955
صاحب الطريقةRooted in Lawshe (1975) for content validity; multilevel extension developed through multilevel psychometric literature from the 1990s onwardLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
النوعValidity evaluation / expert judgmentValidity evaluation framework
المصدر التأسيسيLynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةhierarchical content validity, nested-data content validity, multilevel scale content evaluation, MCVconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
ذات صلة66
الملخصMultilevel content validity extends the classical content validity framework to settings where items, raters, or respondents are nested within hierarchical structures — such as students within schools, patients within clinics, or items rated by panels from distinct cultural or professional groups. It ensures that scale content is relevant and representative at every level of the hierarchy, not just in the aggregate.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Multilevel Content Validity · Construct Validity. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare