قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| أخذ العينات النموذجية متعددة المستويات× | العينة القصدية× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | منهجية المسح | منهجية المسح |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1990s–2000s | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Draws on Patton (typical case sampling) and multilevel research traditions (Hox, Raudenbush) | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| النوع≠ | Purposive sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | multilevel typical case selection, hierarchical typical case sampling, nested typical case sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| ذات صلة≠ | 6 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | Multi-level typical case sampling is a purposive strategy that selects representative, average-profile units at each level of a hierarchical structure — for example, typical classrooms within typical schools, or typical employees within typical departments. It is used when the research goal is to describe or illustrate the ordinary functioning of a nested phenomenon rather than to capture its extremes or full variation. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|