ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

تقييم اختبار الفحص المطابق×تقييم الاختبارات والبرامج الفاحصة×
المجالعلم الأوبئةعلم الأوبئة
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة1980s–2000s (formalized alongside diagnostic accuracy methodology)1968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
صاحب الطريقةMethodological synthesis from matched case-control and diagnostic accuracy traditions (Pepe, Zhou, and others)Wilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
النوعObservational diagnostic study with matched designObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
المصدر التأسيسيPepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
الأسماء البديلةmatched diagnostic accuracy study, paired screening evaluation, matched-pair test performance study, matched screening assessmentscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
ذات صلة66
الملخصMatched screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a screening or diagnostic test using a matched design, in which disease-positive cases are paired with one or more disease-free controls selected to share key characteristics such as age, sex, or clinical setting. Matching controls for confounders before measuring test performance produces more precise and less biased estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and enables direct paired comparisons of competing tests within the same subjects.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Matched Screening Test Evaluation · Screening Test Evaluation. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-17 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare