ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية المحتوى الطولية×صلاحية البناء×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة1995–20001955
صاحب الطريقةHaynes, Richard & Kubany (1995); extended to longitudinal contexts by measurement invariance researchersLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
النوعValidity evaluation techniqueValidity evaluation framework
المصدر التأسيسيHaynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةlongitudinal content validation, temporal content validity, repeated-measure content validity, content validity over timeconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
ذات صلة66
الملخصLongitudinal content validity evaluates whether the items of a measure adequately and consistently represent the intended content domain not only at a single point in time but across repeated administrations. It ensures that the conceptual coverage of a scale remains appropriate and stable as measurement occasions accumulate over a study period.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Longitudinal content validity · Construct Validity. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare