ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

قانون ليتل (L = λW)×نموذج طابور M/M/c: نموذج طابور متعدد الخوادم×
المجالبحوث العملياتبحوث العمليات
العائلةRegression modelRegression model
سنة النشأة19611998
صاحب الطريقةJohn D. C. LittleQueueing-theory tradition; Gross & Harris
النوعExact queueing identityMulti-server Markovian queueing model
المصدر التأسيسيLittle, J. D. C. (1961). A proof for the queuing formula: L = λW. Operations Research, 9(3), 383–387. DOI ↗Gross, D., & Harris, C. M. (1998). Fundamentals of Queueing Theory (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-471-17083-9
الأسماء البديلةL = λW Theorem, Little's Theorem, Little's Result, Little YasasıMulti-Server Erlang Queue, c-Server Markovian Queue, Erlang-C Queue, Çok Sunuculu M/M/c Kuyruğu
ذات صلة33
الملخصLittle's Law is a fundamental theorem in queueing theory that relates the long-run average number of items in a stable system (L) to the long-run average arrival rate (λ) and the long-run average time an item spends in the system (W), expressed as L = λW. Introduced and rigorously proved by John D. C. Little in 1961, the law holds for virtually any stable stochastic system, requiring no assumptions about arrival distributions, service distributions, or queue disciplines.The M/M/c queue is a multi-server stochastic model in which customers arrive according to a Poisson process at rate λ, are served by c identical servers each with exponentially distributed service times at rate μ, and wait in a single common queue when all servers are busy. Systematized within classical queueing theory and thoroughly treated by Gross and Harris (1998), it extends the simpler M/M/1 model to settings with parallel servers, making it the foundational tool for capacity planning in service systems.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Little's Law · M/M/c Queue. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare