قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| تحليل المحادثة التفسيري× | Thematic Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال≠ | نوعي | البحث النوعي |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1960s–1970s (CA); interpretive strand formalised 1990s–2000s | 2006 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); interpretive extension by discourse scholars including Margaret Wetherell | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| النوع≠ | Qualitative discourse research design | Method |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412922271 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | ICA, interpretive CA, hermeneutic conversation analysis, qualitative conversation analysis | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| ذات صلة≠ | 6 | 3 |
| الملخص≠ | Interpretive conversation analysis (ICA) examines how meaning is co-constructed turn by turn in talk, combining the micro-sequential rigour of classic conversation analysis with an explicitly interpretive stance. Rather than treating sequential organisation as the sole analytic object, ICA asks what participants are doing socially and discursively through their turns — what identities, institutional agendas, and power relations are built and contested in interaction. It draws on naturally occurring or recorded talk from social, institutional, or interview settings. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|