ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

(Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS) طريقة هزان فازي توبسيس مع معلومات وزن غير مكتملة اختيارية×أهمية المعايير من خلال الارتباط البيني للمعايير×
المجالاتخاذ القراراتخاذ القرار
العائلةMCDMMCDM
سنة النشأة20131995
صاحب الطريقةXu, Z., Zhang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
النوعDistance-to-ideal ranking (Hwang-Yoon 1981) extended to Hesitant Fuzzy Elements (HFE ⊂ [0,1]) via the hesitant normalised Euclidean distance d_1 (Xu-Xia 2011b); supports three weight-information modes: fully specified, completely unknown (Eq.(22) maximizing deviation closed-form), and partly known (Model M-2 linear programme).Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
المصدر التأسيسيXu, Z., Zhang, X. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلة
ذات صلة88
الملخصHF-TOPSIS (Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS with optional incomplete weight information (Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, Z., Zhang, X. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: HF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare