ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

Difference-in-Means Estimator×Audit Experiment×
المجالPolitical SciencePolitical Science
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19232011
صاحب الطريقةJerzy Neyman (design-based potential-outcomes framework)Butler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage)
النوعDesign-based estimator of the average treatment effectRandomized field experiment using matched fictitious requests
المصدر التأسيسيGerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN: 9780393979954Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةNeyman estimator, Design-based ATE estimator, Difference of sample means, Mean-difference treatment effect estimatorCorrespondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness audit
ذات صلة44
الملخصThe difference-in-means estimator is the design-based workhorse for analyzing randomized experiments: it estimates the average treatment effect simply as the difference between the average outcome among treated units and the average outcome among control units. Rooted in Jerzy Neyman's potential-outcomes framework and central to modern treatments by Imbens and Rubin and by Gerber and Green, it is unbiased under randomization, comes with a conservative Neyman variance estimator, and supports exact randomization inference, requiring no model of how outcomes are generated.An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Difference-in-Means Estimator · Audit Experiment. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-24 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare