قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| مصفوفة المنهجيات المختلطة القائمة على التصميم× | البحث القائم على التصميم - تجربة التصميم التعليمي× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال≠ | تصميم البحث | الأساليب الميدانية |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2003–2011 | 1992 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark; Jennifer C. Greene | Ann L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992) |
| النوع≠ | Mixed methods design classification framework | Interventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 | Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة | mixed methods design matrix, MM design typology matrix, mixed methods design framework, DBMM matrix | DBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research |
| ذات صلة≠ | 1 | 6 |
| الملخص≠ | The design-based mixed methods matrix is a systematic framework for selecting and structuring mixed methods research designs. It organises key design decisions — purpose, timing of data strands, point of integration, and weighting of quantitative versus qualitative components — into a coherent matrix that guides researchers toward a defensible, transparent design. The framework draws on the typology traditions of Creswell and Plano Clark and Greene's purposes-based approach. | Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|