قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| بحث تاريخ الحياة النقدي× | التاريخ الشفوي× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | نوعي | نوعي |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1980s–1990s | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Ivor Goodson; influenced by critical theory traditions (Freire, Habermas, feminist scholars) | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| النوع≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Goodson, I. F., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life History Research in Educational Settings: Learning from Lives. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335205530 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| الأسماء البديلة | critical biographical research, critical life history, critical life history method, critical biographical inquiry | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| ذات صلة | 6 | 6 |
| الملخص≠ | Critical life history research combines the biographical depth of life history methodology with critical theory perspectives — drawing on feminist, Marxist, postcolonial, or critical race frameworks — to examine how structural power relations, social inequalities, and institutional forces shape individual lives. Rather than treating a life story as a purely personal account, this approach reads it as evidence of wider social and political conditions, using individual narratives to surface systemic patterns of oppression, resistance, and agency. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|