قارن الطرق

	أهمية المعايير من خلال الارتباط البيني للمعايير	SWARA II
المجال	اتخاذ القرار	اتخاذ القرار
العائلة	MCDM	MCDM
سنة النشأة	1995	2010
صاحب الطريقة	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.	Keršuliene, Zavadskas, and Turskis; extended by Zolfani et al.
النوع	Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting	Expert-based stepwise weight derivation with ratio refinement
المصدر التأسيسي	Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research	Keršuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by evaluating opposing parties' interest in civil litigation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(3), 412-422.
الأسماء البديلة	—	SWARA II, SWARA 2
ذات صلة	8	4
الملخص	CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	SWARA II (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis - Improved) is an enhanced variant of the SWARA method for deriving criterion weights from expert assessments. Instead of requiring pairwise comparisons or absolute weight assignments, SWARA II asks experts to rank criteria, then assess the relative importance of each criterion compared to the next-ranked one. Improved variants enhance robustness and interpretability of weight derivation.