قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| تحليل التكلفة والعائد (CBA)× | تحليل الفعالية من حيث التكلفة (CEA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | اقتصاديات الصحة | اقتصاديات الصحة |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1970s | 1984 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Boardman, Greenberg, and colleagues (welfare economics) | Drummond & Stoddart (Health Economics Research Group, McMaster University) |
| النوع | Method | Method |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. link ↗ | Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة | CBA, economic appraisal, benefit-cost ratio | CEA, ICER, Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio |
| ذات صلة | 5 | 5 |
| الملخص≠ | Cost-benefit analysis compares the total monetary value of benefits produced by a program against its total monetary costs, reporting net present value (NPV) or benefit-cost ratio (BCR). Rooted in welfare economics and used extensively in public policy (transportation, environmental, education, health), CBA answers the question: 'Is this program worth doing from a societal perspective?' Unlike cost-effectiveness analysis, CBA monetizes both costs and benefits, enabling comparison across disparate program types. | Cost-effectiveness analysis compares the incremental cost per unit of health benefit gained by one intervention relative to a comparator (standard care or best alternative). Developed rigorously in the 1980s by Drummond, Stoddart, and colleagues, CEA is now the standard framework for technology appraisal globally. NICE, HAS, CADTH, and other health technology assessment bodies use CEA to decide which treatments warrant public funding and at what price. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|