ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية المحتوى×التحليل العاملي الاستكشافي (EFA)×
المجالالقياس النفسيالإحصاء
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة1975
صاحب الطريقةC. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement
النوعValidity evidence / expert judgement procedureLatent variable / dimension reduction
المصدر التأسيسيLawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةcontent-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationcommon factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis
ذات صلة64
الملخصContent validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v2
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Content Validity · EFA. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare