ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

صلاحية البناء×تحليل العوامل التأكيدي (CFA)×
المجالالقياس النفسيالقياس النفسي
العائلةLatent structureLatent structure
سنة النشأة19551969
صاحب الطريقةLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. MeehlKarl Gustav Jöreskog
النوعValidity evaluation frameworkHypothesis-testing latent variable model
المصدر التأسيسيCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretationCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
ذات صلة64
الملخصConstruct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Construct Validity · Confirmatory factor analysis. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-15 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare