قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| النظرية المفسرة المقارنة× | دراسة حالة مقارنة× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | نوعي | نوعي |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| النوع≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| الأسماء البديلة | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| ذات صلة≠ | 6 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|