قارن الطرق
راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.
| مقياس CollaboRATE لاتخاذ القرار المشترك× | مقياس الصراع القراري× | |
|---|---|---|
| المجال | الرعاية المتمحورة حول المريض | الرعاية المتمحورة حول المريض |
| العائلة | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| سنة النشأة≠ | 2013 | 1995 |
| صاحب الطريقة≠ | Glyn Elwyn | Annette O'Connor |
| النوع | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| المصدر التأسيسي≠ | Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗ | O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25-30. DOI ↗ |
| الأسماء البديلة≠ | Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale | DCS-16, Decisional Conflict Inventory |
| ذات صلة | 4 | 4 |
| الملخص≠ | CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems. | The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item self-reported outcome measure that quantifies the degree of uncertainty, value ambivalence, and decision distress experienced by patients facing healthcare choices. Developed by Annette O'Connor in 1995, the DCS assesses five core domains: personal uncertainty, understanding of options and outcomes, clarity of personal values, perceived social support, and confidence in making the decision. It has become the gold standard for measuring decisional conflict in healthcare research and clinical trials of decision support interventions. |
| ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات ↗ |
|
|