ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

النظرية الكلاسيكية المتجذرة×بحث الفعل×
المجالنوعيالبحث النوعي
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19671946
صاحب الطريقةBarney G. Glaser and Anselm L. StraussKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
النوعQualitative research methodMethod
المصدر التأسيسيGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةGlaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GTParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
ذات صلة61
الملخصClassic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 2 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Classic Grounded Theory · Action Research. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-18 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare