ScholarGate
المساعد

قارن الطرق

راجع الطرق التي اخترتها جنبًا إلى جنب؛ الصفوف المختلفة مميَّزة.

Citizens' Jury Method×Participatory Evaluation×
المجالPublic PolicyPublic Policy
العائلةProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
سنة النشأة19861998
صاحب الطريقةNed Crosby (Jefferson Center); Peter Dienel developed the parallel PlanungszelleJ. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth Whitmore
النوعDeliberative mini-public methodCollaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approach
المصدر التأسيسيCrosby, N., Kelly, J. M., & Schaefer, P. (1986). Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46(2), 170–178. DOI ↗Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗
الأسماء البديلةCitizens Jury, Citizen Panel, Citizens' PanelCollaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory Evaluation
ذات صلة44
الملخصA citizens' jury is a deliberative method that convenes a small, demographically representative panel of randomly selected citizens to consider a policy question in depth and produce reasoned recommendations. Modelled loosely on the trial jury, it gives ordinary people time, balanced information, expert witnesses and skilled facilitation so they can deliberate and reach a considered judgement on behalf of the wider public. Developed in the United States by Ned Crosby and his Jefferson Center, with a parallel German tradition (the Planungszelle) created by Peter Dienel, it is a leading form of deliberative 'mini-public'.Participatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved.
ScholarGateمجموعة البيانات
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 المصادر
  3. PUBLISHED

انتقل إلى البحث تنزيل الشرائح

ScholarGateقارن الطرق: Citizens' Jury Method · Participatory Evaluation. استُرجع بتاريخ 2026-06-24 من https://scholargate.app/ar/compare